From mindless to mindful practice--cognitive bias and clinical decision making.
نویسنده
چکیده
n engl j med 368;26 nejm.org june 27, 2013 2445 correct diagnoses as often as we think: the diagnostic failure rate is estimated to be 10 to 15%. The rate is highest among specialties in which patients are diagnostically undifferentiated, such as emergency medicine, family medicine, and internal medicine. Error in the visual specialties, such as radiology and pathology, is considerably lower, probably around 2%.1 Diagnostic error has multiple causes, but principal among them are cognitive errors. Usually, it’s not a lack of knowledge that leads to failure, but problems with the clinician’s thinking. Esoteric diagnoses are occasionally missed, but common illnesses are commonly misdiagnosed. For example, physicians know the pathophysiology of pulmonary embolus in excruciating detail, yet because its signs and symptoms are notoriously variable and overlap with those of numerous other diseases, this important diagnosis was missed a staggering 55% of the time in a series of fatal cases.2 Over the past 40 years, work by cognitive psychologists and others has pointed to the human mind’s vulnerability to cognitive biases, logical fallacies, false assumptions, and other reasoning failures. It seems that much of our everyday thinking is f lawed, and clinicians are not immune to the problem (see box). More than 100 biases affecting clinical decision making have been described, and many medical disciplines now acknowledge their pervasive influence on our thinking. Cognitive failures are best understood in the context of how our brains manage and process information. The two principal modes, automatic and controlled, are colloquially referred to as “intuitive” and “analytic”; psychologists know them as Type 1 and Type 2 processes. Various conceptualizations of the reasoning process have been proposed, but most can be incorporated into this dual-process system. This system is more than a model: it is accepted that the two processes involve different cortical mechanisms with associated neurophysiologic and neuroanatomical From Mindless to Mindful Practice — Cognitive Bias and Clinical Decision Making
منابع مشابه
Mitigating Evidentiary Bias in Planning and Policy-Making; Comment on “Reflective Practice: How the World Bank Explored Its Own Biases?”
The field of cognitive psychology has increasingly provided scientific insights to explore how humans are subject to unconscious sources of evidentiary bias, leading to errors that can affect judgement and decision-making. Increasingly these insights are being applied outside the realm of individual decision-making to the collective arena of policy-making as well. A recent editorial in this jou...
متن کاملFrom Mindless to Mindful Decision Making: Reflecting on Prescriptive Processes
Huber, Michaela (Ph.D., Department of Psychology and Neuroscience) From mindless to mindful decision making: Reflecting on prescriptive processes Thesis directed by Leaf Van Boven, Associate Professor, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience People frequently make judgments and decisions in ways that, in hindsight, they might prefer to have made differently. Their judgments and decisions may ...
متن کاملMindful IT Adoption: Making the right strategic decisions by knowing why and how to adopt enterprise systems?
Corporate investment in enterprise level IT systems has been characterised by high rates of failure. The paper presents a knowledge based perspective to examine how firms adopt and implement enterprise systems in order to better understand how organisations can achieve reliable outcomes from such investments. The case presented explores the key decision stages of a major ERP investment, focusin...
متن کاملSystem Factors Influencing the Australian Nurses' Evidence-based Clinical Decision Making: A Systematic Review of Recent Studies
Background: There is growing attention to evidence-based practice in Australian clinical contexts and nursing literature. Recent research explores the dimensions of evidence-based practice; however, the implementation of evidence-based clinical decision making has been identified as a cumbersome process. Aim: This study aimed to review the literature syst...
متن کاملClinical Decision-Making: a Way to Professional Empowerment in Nursing
Background. The dynamic and uncertain nature of health care environment requires nurses to be competent decision makers and to respond to the clients needs. Recently, the public and the government have criticized Iranian nurses because of a low quality patient care. However, the nurses’ views and experiences concern- ing the factors affecting their clinical practice and clinical decision making...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The New England journal of medicine
دوره 368 26 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013